Color-blind racism is racism without racists. Bonilla Silva
goes to talk about this term heavy in chapters 2-5. This term can be broken
down into four different frames: abstract liberalism, cultural racism,
minimization of racism and naturalization. “The frame of abstract liberalism
involves using ideas associated with political liberalism and economic
liberalism in an abstract manner to explain racial matters,” (Bonilla-Silva 28).
Whites can seem reasonable and even right while opposing the issue of
inequality even though people of color are strictly overlooked in most good
jobs, schools, and universities. “Cultural racism is a frame that relies on
culturally bases arguments such as “Mexicans do not put much emphasis on
education” or “blacks have too many babies” to explain the standing of minorities
in society,” (Bonilla-Silva 28). Cultural racism are stereotypes against races
that aren’t white, pre judgment against a race a=or person before getting to
know that person or group. “Minimization of racism is a frame that states
discrimination is no longer a central factor of affecting minorities’ life
chances,” (Bonilla-Silva 29). This term shows that there is no more discriminating
against races with jobs, universities, or schools. If this were the case why do
school and jobs have to have a certain number of blacks or Hispanics enrolled
in their schools, or working for their jobs? Why must everyone answer what race
you are on an application or resume. “Naturalization
is a frame that allows whites to explain away racial phenomena by suggesting
they are natural occurrences,” (Bonilla-Silva (28). People tend to simplify and
stereotype the situation and blame it on the racial group as normal tendencies.
Bonilla-Silva states that color
blindness is attributed in the basic style of communication between
individuals. When interviewing the white individuals, he noticed that their
responses were racially disturbing. The answers in their responses that displayed
color-blind racism were picked through by the author. Some examples of verbal
responses that showed racism are racism without racial labels, apparent
denials, back and forth responses, reverse responses, and cut in comments. Bonilla-Silva
describes the “race talk” of colorblind racism as, “the way in which this
radical ideology allows users to legitimate themselves individually and the
system of white supremacy, privilege, complicity as a whole,” (Bonilla-Silva 53).
Whites relieve themselves of social responsibility
for the world around them, as if actions have no effect. “The “multiplier
effect” or the “wages of whiteness” of a history in our favor has had no effect
upon disproportionate wealth and ownership accumulation, political power,
access to jobs, schools, education, and other resources necessary for social advancement
equality” (Bonilla-Silva 81). Whites may not see this as being white; they don’t
have to acknowledge the unearned privilege. Therefore, “white privilege isn’t
only unequal wealth, access, resources but it is also the privilege of not
having to acknowledge where this came from, the cost to those who were denied
so that whites could have what they have”(Peggy McIntosh, White Privilege). White
privilege is unearned, it is historically rooted, it is the ability to choose ignorance
as pleasure and not be held responsible for it.
http://ted.coe.wayne.edu/ele3600/mcintosh.html
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment